TR Performance CoachingEnquire Now
HomeBlogTraining
A man leaning forward with his hands on his knees in a gym, catching his breath next to a rower and dumbbell rack after a hard session — the kind of effort the article unpacks when comparing HIIT and steady state cardio for fat loss
Training — Cardiovascular

HIIT or Steady State Cardio: Which One Should You Actually Be Doing for Fat Loss?

By Tanvir Singh Rayet|TR PERFORMANCE COACHING

The debate between HIIT and steady state cardio has been raging in the fitness industry for years. Scroll through social media and you will find trainers claiming HIIT is the only way to burn fat, while others insist that low intensity walking is all you need. The truth, as with most things in fitness, is more nuanced than either side wants to admit. The real question is not which one is better. It is which one is better for you, right now, given your goals, your lifestyle, and your current level of training.

In this article, I am going to break down exactly what HIIT and steady state cardio are in plain, simple language. I will explain how each one affects your body, when to use each one, and how to fit them into a training programme that actually produces results. No jargon. No fads. Just evidence and experience.

First Things First: What Do These Terms Actually Mean?

Before I get into the comparison, let me define the terms clearly because they are thrown around constantly and often incorrectly.

CARDIO TYPES EXPLAINED IN PLAIN LANGUAGE
HIITHigh Intensity Interval Training. Short bursts of maximum or near maximum effort followed by rest or very low effort periods. A HIIT session typically lasts 15 to 25 minutes. Think: sprinting for 20 seconds, resting for 40 seconds, repeating.
LISSLow Intensity Steady State. Sustained activity at a low effort level for a longer duration. Think: a brisk 30 to 60 minute walk where you could hold a conversation throughout.
MISSModerate Intensity Steady State. Sustained activity at a moderate effort level. Think: a 30 to 45 minute jog at a consistent pace that feels challenging but maintainable. This is what most people mean when they say “cardio.”

The critical distinction I want you to understand is this: these are not just different speeds of the same thing. They place fundamentally different demands on your body, use different energy systems, and produce different physiological adaptations. Getting this wrong is why so many people spin their wheels for months without results.

Infographic titled The Three Types of Cardio — What the Labels Actually Mean, with three side by side cards: LISS (low intensity steady state) at 50 to 65 percent max heart rate, effort 2 to 3 out of 10, duration 30 to 60 minutes, example brisk walking; MISS (moderate intensity steady state) at 65 to 80 percent max heart rate, effort 5 to 7 out of 10, duration 30 to 45 minutes, example steady jogging; and HIIT (high intensity interval training) at 85 to 95 percent max heart rate, effort 8 to 10 out of 10, duration 15 to 25 minutes, example bike or rower sprints — bottom banner reading Not Just Different Speeds, Different Tools

The Problem: Most People Are Doing the Wrong Type of Cardio for Their Goals

Here is what I see with the majority of new clients who come to me. They are doing moderate intensity steady state cardio, usually jogging on a treadmill or using a cross trainer, for 30 to 45 minutes, three to five times per week. They have been doing it for months. And they have very little to show for it.

The issue is not effort or consistency. These are often hardworking, committed people. The issue is that MISS is the least efficient form of cardio for body composition goals, and when overdone, it can actually work against you. A meta analysis published in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research found that concurrent endurance and resistance training, known as the interference effect, reduced strength and power gains compared to resistance training alone (1). In plain terms, too much moderate intensity cardio can directly undermine your ability to build or maintain muscle.

And here is the cruel irony: most people default to MISS because it feels like “proper exercise.” Sweating, breathing hard, watching the calorie counter tick up. It feels productive. But as I explained in my previous article, those calorie counters are wildly inaccurate, and the actual metabolic return on 45 minutes of steady jogging is far less impressive than most people believe (2).

Top Tip

If you have been jogging three to five times per week for more than six weeks and your body composition has not changed, that is strong evidence that your approach needs to change. More of the same will not fix a fundamentally flawed strategy.

What Most People Get Wrong About HIIT

On the other end of the spectrum, HIIT has been massively overhyped by the fitness industry. It has been marketed as the ultimate fat loss tool, and while it is genuinely effective, the way most people do it bears no resemblance to actual high intensity interval training.

Let me be very direct about this. If you can do a “HIIT” class for 45 minutes, it is not HIIT. True HIIT requires maximum or near maximum effort during the work intervals. You should be unable to speak. Your heart rate should be at 85 to 95 percent of your maximum. And you should feel genuinely unable to continue after 15 to 25 minutes. The original research by Dr Izumi Tabata, whose protocol became one of the most famous HIIT formats in the world, used just four minutes of total work time, but at an intensity that pushed trained athletes to their absolute limit (3).

A study published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine compared HIIT to moderate intensity continuous training for fat loss and found that HIIT was associated with 28.5 percent greater reductions in total absolute fat mass (4). That is a significant difference. But the key word is intensity. The benefits only materialise when the effort is genuinely high. What most gyms call “HIIT” is really just circuit training at moderate intensity, which is fine but does not deliver the same metabolic advantages.

REAL HIIT VS WHAT MOST PEOPLE ACTUALLY DO
Real HIIT Duration15 to 25 minutes total session, including warm up and cool down
Fake “HIIT” Duration45 to 60 minutes, which is impossible at true high intensity
Real HIIT Effort Level85 to 95% of maximum heart rate during work intervals. You cannot speak.
Fake “HIIT” Effort Level60 to 75% of maximum heart rate. You can hold a conversation.
Real HIIT Work to RestShort work intervals (10 to 30 seconds) with equal or longer rest (30 to 90 seconds)
Fake “HIIT” Work to RestOften 45 seconds work, 15 seconds rest, which is just circuit training
Real HIIT FrequencyMaximum 1 to 2 sessions per week due to the recovery demand
Fake “HIIT” Frequency4 to 6 times per week, which would be impossible at genuine intensity

Top Tip

If you want to do real HIIT, start with one session per week on a piece of equipment that allows quick transitions between work and rest, such as a stationary bike, rower, or assault bike. Sprint for 15 to 20 seconds at absolute maximum effort, then rest for 40 to 60 seconds. Repeat for 6 to 10 rounds. That is it. If you feel like you could do more, you did not go hard enough.

Infographic titled Real HIIT vs What Most People Do, Why The Gym Class Label Is Misleading, comparing Real HIIT (duration 15 to 25 minutes total, effort 85 to 95 percent max heart rate cannot speak, work to rest 10 to 30 seconds work and 30 to 90 seconds rest, frequency 1 to 2 sessions per week max) against What Most People Do (duration 45 to 60 minutes, effort 60 to 75 percent max heart rate able to hold a conversation, work to rest 45 seconds work and 15 seconds rest, frequency 4 to 6 sessions per week) — bottom banner reading If You Can Do It For 45 Minutes, It Is Not HIIT

The Solution: How to Use Each Type of Cardio for Maximum Results

Now that you understand what these terms actually mean, let me show you how I use them in practice with my coaching clients. The answer to “HIIT or steady state?” is almost always “both, but in the right proportions and at the right time.”

LISS: Your Everyday Foundation

Low intensity steady state cardio, which in practical terms means brisk walking, should be the foundation of your daily movement. It is the form of cardio I prescribe most frequently and the one I use personally every single day.

The reason LISS is so valuable has nothing to do with calorie burning during the session, although it does contribute. The real value is threefold. First, it increases your Non Exercise Activity Thermogenesis, or NEAT, which is the total energy you burn outside of formal exercise. Research by Levine published in Best Practice and Research Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism found that NEAT can vary by up to 2,000 calories per day between individuals and is one of the biggest determinants of whether someone maintains a healthy weight or gains fat (5). Second, walking aids recovery between resistance training sessions by promoting blood flow to working muscles without creating additional stress (6). Third, it has profound benefits for mental health, stress management, and sleep quality, all of which directly support fat loss through hormonal pathways.

LISS BenefitHow It Helps Fat LossThe Science
Increases daily NEATBurns 200 to 500+ extra calories per day without adding training stressLevine JA. NEAT accounts for the majority of non resting energy expenditure (5)
Supports recoveryPromotes blood flow and nutrient delivery to muscles without impairing adaptationPromotes parasympathetic nervous system activity (6)
Reduces cortisolLowers stress hormones that promote fat storage, especially around the midsectionWalking in nature shown to reduce cortisol by 12 to 16% (7)
Improves sleepBetter sleep quality supports growth hormone release and appetite regulationRegular walking improves both sleep onset and sleep quality (8)
Sustainable long termNo recovery cost, no interference with training, can be done every day indefinitelyRisk of injury is negligible compared to running or high impact cardio

Top Tip

If you currently do fewer than 7,000 steps per day, increasing to 8,000 to 10,000 steps will likely have a bigger impact on your fat loss than adding any formal cardio sessions. Walk to work, take the stairs, walk during phone calls, walk after meals. Build it into your life rather than treating it as a separate workout.

A person briskly walking outdoors at a sustainable pace, capturing the role of LISS as the everyday foundation of cardio — the form that lifts daily NEAT, supports recovery, lowers cortisol and improves sleep without interfering with resistance training

HIIT: Your Precision Tool

HIIT is not your daily cardio. It is a precision tool that you deploy strategically when you need an extra push. I typically introduce HIIT into a client's programme when three conditions are met: they are already resistance training consistently, their NEAT is at a good level (8,000 plus steps per day), and their fat loss has begun to plateau despite good nutrition adherence.

When used correctly, HIIT provides a metabolic stimulus that steady state cardio simply cannot match. A study in the Journal of Obesity found that HIIT significantly reduced total abdominal and visceral fat, the dangerous fat stored around your organs, even when total exercise volume was lower than moderate intensity groups (9). Another study in Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise showed that the excess post exercise oxygen consumption, or EPOC, from a HIIT session elevated metabolic rate for up to 24 hours after the session ended (10). In plain terms, your body continues to burn extra calories long after you finish.

But and this is critical, HIIT is demanding. It taxes your central nervous system, your joints, and your recovery capacity. If you are also doing three to four resistance training sessions per week, adding more than one to two HIIT sessions creates a real risk of overtraining, poor recovery, elevated cortisol, and ultimately worse results, not better ones.

Important

More is not better with HIIT. One to two sessions per week is the maximum I prescribe for most clients. If you are already training with weights three to four times per week, you need to be extremely careful about total training volume. Overtraining does not just stall progress. It actively reverses it by disrupting sleep, appetite regulation, and hormonal balance.

MISS: The One I Use Least

Moderate intensity steady state cardio, your typical 30 to 45 minute jog, is the form I prescribe least often for fat loss and body composition clients. That does not mean it is bad. It simply means it has the poorest risk to reward ratio for the goals most of my clients have.

The interference effect is real and well documented. Wilson and colleagues published a meta analysis in the Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research confirming that concurrent endurance and resistance training impaired strength and power development (1). MISS is the primary driver of this interference because it conditions your body for endurance, which places competing demands against the strength and muscle building adaptations you are trying to create with resistance training.

However, I do use MISS in specific situations. If a client genuinely enjoys running or cycling, I will programme it in moderation because adherence always trumps perfection. If a client is training for a running event or a charity challenge, MISS is obviously necessary. And for some clients with very high stress levels, a gentle jog can serve a mental health purpose that outweighs its metabolic limitations.

The Head to Head Comparison: HIIT vs LISS vs MISS

FactorLISS (Walking)HIIT (Intervals)MISS (Jogging)
Session Duration30 to 60+ minutes15 to 25 minutes30 to 45 minutes
Effort LevelLow (2 to 3 out of 10)Very High (8 to 10 out of 10)Moderate (5 to 7 out of 10)
Calories Burned Per SessionLow to moderateModerate to highModerate
Post Session Calorie Burn (EPOC)MinimalHigh: up to 24 hours (10)Low to moderate
Impact on Muscle RetentionNone (fully protective)Minimal if limited to 1 to 2x per weekCan interfere with muscle retention if overdone (1)
Recovery DemandNoneHigh (needs 48+ hours between sessions)Moderate
Injury RiskVery lowModerate (especially if form breaks down under fatigue)Moderate (repetitive stress injuries common)
Interference with Weight TrainingNoneMinimal if scheduled correctlySignificant if done frequently (1)
Best ForEveryone. Daily movement foundation. Recovery support.Plateaus. Time efficiency. Visceral fat reduction.Endurance goals. Enjoyment. Mental health.
Recommended Frequency5 to 7 days per week1 to 2 sessions per week maximum1 to 2 sessions per week if desired
Infographic titled HIIT vs LISS vs MISS, The Scorecard, Six Factors That Determine The Right Tool For The Job — a dot rated table scoring LISS, HIIT and MISS across muscle preservation, EPOC and afterburn, time efficiency, recovery demand (lower is better), injury risk (lower is better) and daily sustainability, with a bottom banner reading Walk Daily, Sprint Weekly, Jog Sparingly

How I Actually Programme Cardio for Fat Loss Clients

Theory is useful but what matters is how it translates into a real weekly schedule. Here is a practical example of how I might structure a week for a typical fat loss client who also resistance trains.

DayTrainingCardioSteps Target
MondayResistance Training (full body)None (walking to and from gym counts)8,000 to 10,000
TuesdayRest from gymLISS: 30 to 45 minute brisk walk10,000+
WednesdayResistance Training (full body)None8,000 to 10,000
ThursdayRest from gymHIIT: 15 to 20 minutes on rower or bike (if needed)8,000 to 10,000
FridayResistance Training (full body)None8,000 to 10,000
SaturdayOptional light activityLISS: 45 to 60 minute walk, hike, or casual sport10,000+
SundayFull restLISS: gentle walk if desired7,000+

Notice what this does not include: five days of cardio, hour long runs, or daily HIIT classes. The foundation is resistance training, supported by daily walking, with HIIT added only when needed as a precision tool. This structure works for men and women, for omnivores and vegetarians and vegans, and for clients from their 20s through to their 60s. The specific exercises, weights, and volumes change for each individual, but the overarching framework stays the same.

Top Tip

If you are currently doing five or more cardio sessions per week with no resistance training, do not try to change everything at once. Start by replacing two of those cardio sessions with resistance training. Keep the remaining cardio sessions and add more walking to your daily routine. Over four to six weeks, gradually shift the balance towards more resistance training and less formal cardio.

A man standing tall in a gym holding a loaded barbell at his hips, weight plates loaded on each side — illustrating the resistance training foundation that anchors the weekly fat loss programme outlined in the schedule above

A Quick Note on Nutrition and Cardio

Your body runs on the fuel you give it, and the type of cardio you do interacts with your nutrition in important ways. HIIT is glycolytic, meaning it primarily burns carbohydrates for fuel during the session. If you are following a very low carbohydrate diet, your HIIT performance will likely suffer. LISS, on the other hand, relies predominantly on fat oxidation at lower intensities, which is one reason it pairs so well with almost any dietary approach (11).

Regardless of which form of cardio you use, protein remains the priority. As I always tell my clients, your protein intake should be built around your goals, not around your cardio. Aim for 1.4 to 2.0 grams per kilogram of body weight per day (12), sourced from whatever dietary background suits you. That means chicken and fish for omnivores, eggs and dairy for vegetarians, and tofu, tempeh, seitan, soy protein, pea protein, and lentils for those who are fully plant based.

Top Tip

If you do a HIIT session, eat a meal containing both protein and carbohydrates within two hours afterwards. This supports recovery and glycogen replenishment. A good example would be scrambled eggs on toast, a chicken and rice bowl, or a tofu stir fry with noodles.

YOUR QUICK REFERENCE CHEAT SHEET: HIIT VS STEADY STATE CARDIO

LISS (walking) should be your daily foundation. Aim for 8,000 to 10,000 steps every day.

Resistance training 2 to 4 times per week should be your primary exercise for fat loss and body composition.

HIIT should be used 1 to 2 times per week maximum, and only when genuinely needed to break a plateau.

MISS (jogging) should be used sparingly for fat loss goals. It can interfere with muscle building if overdone.

If you can do a “HIIT” session for 45 minutes, it is not HIIT. Real HIIT is 15 to 25 minutes and leaves you unable to continue.

Your nutrition, particularly protein intake, matters far more than which type of cardio you choose.

Never use gym machine calorie counters to decide how much to eat. Plan nutrition independently.

When in doubt, walk more and lift weights. This combination beats every other approach for long term body composition.

Where to Start

The HIIT versus steady state debate does not need to be a debate at all. Both tools serve a purpose. The key is understanding which one to use, when, and in what proportion. Most people need far more walking, far more resistance training, and far less moderate intensity cardio than they are currently doing.

The principles work across the board because they are based on physiology, not trends.

If you are unsure where to start, or if you have been stuck doing the same cardio routine with diminishing returns, that is exactly the kind of problem I solve every day. I coach one-to-one online globally, and every programme is built specifically for you. Get in touch through trperformancecoaching.com and let me help you build a programme that actually works.

Work with Me

Get a personalised coaching plan built around your goals, your schedule, and your life.

Enquire Now

References

  1. Wilson JM, Marin PJ, Rhea MR, Wilson SMC, Loenneke JP, Anderson JC. Concurrent training: a meta-analysis examining interference of aerobic and resistance exercises. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research. 2012; 26(8): 2293-2307.
  2. Ozemek C, Kirschner MM, Galanis CR, et al. Validity of commonly used cardio equipment calorie expenditure estimates during graded exercise testing. Journal of Sports Sciences. 2014; 32(11): 1070-1077.
  3. Tabata I, Nishimura K, Kouzaki M, et al. Effects of moderate-intensity endurance and high-intensity intermittent training on anaerobic capacity and VO2max. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 1996; 28(10): 1327-1330.
  4. Viana RB, Naves JPA, Coswig VS, et al. Is interval training the magic bullet for fat loss? A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing moderate-intensity continuous training with high-intensity interval training (HIIT). British Journal of Sports Medicine. 2019; 53(10): 655-664.
  5. Levine JA. Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT). Best Practice and Research Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2002; 16(4): 679-702.
  6. Dupuy O, Douzi W, Theurot D, Bosquet L, Dugue B. An evidence-based approach for choosing post-exercise recovery techniques to reduce markers of muscle damage, soreness, fatigue, and inflammation. Frontiers in Physiology. 2018; 9: 403.
  7. Li Q, Morimoto K, Nakadai A, et al. Forest bathing enhances human natural killer activity and expression of anti-cancer proteins. International Journal of Immunopathology and Pharmacology. 2007; 20(2 Suppl 2): 3-8.
  8. Kredlow MA, Capozzoli MC, Hearon BA, Calkins AW, Otto MW. The effects of physical activity on sleep: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2015; 38(3): 427-449.
  9. Boutcher SH. High-intensity intermittent exercise and fat loss. Journal of Obesity. 2011; 2011: 868305.
  10. Greer BK, Sirithienthad P, Moffatt RJ, Marcello RT, Panton LB. EPOC comparison between isocaloric bouts of steady-state aerobic, intermittent aerobic, and resistance training. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport. 2015; 86(2): 190-195.
  11. Achten J, Jeukendrup AE. Optimizing fat oxidation through exercise and diet. Nutrition. 2004; 20(7-8): 716-727.
  12. Jager R, Kerksick CM, Campbell BI, et al. International Society of Sports Nutrition position stand: protein and exercise. Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition. 2017; 14: 20.

Continue Reading

How Much Cardio Do You Really Need? A No Nonsense Guide
Cardiovascular

How Much Cardio Do You Really Need? A No Nonsense Guide

Next →
← Back to Cardiovascular

High-performance expertise, at your fingertips.

Evidence-based coaching advice delivered straight to your inbox.